A study carried out by epidemiologist Dr. John Tulloch at the University of Liverpool in collaboration with CVS, has revealed the scale and complexity of work-related injuries in UK companion animal veterinary practices and highlights a need for improved safety protocols and cultural change across the veterinary profession.

The research surveyed 647 UK-based employees of CVS’ companion animal practices between December 2022 and March 2023.

Participants included veterinary surgeons, veterinary nurses, patient care assistants, receptionists and administrative staff.

The survey explored injury prevalence, the context in which injuries occurred, and the behaviours of injured persons.

Over 77% of respondents reported experiencing a work-related injury at any point during their career.

Injury rates were highest among veterinary nurses (60.2% injured in the last year), followed by veterinary surgeons (58.3%).

Most injuries occurred in clinical areas such as consulting rooms, prep areas, and wards.

Unsurprisingly, animal-related injuries were the most common, particularly involving cats and dogs during restraint or clinical procedures.

However, a significant number of injuries to receptionists and administrators also involved restraining animals, highlighting the multi-faceted nature of these roles.

Clinical examinations were the most common activity occurring at the point of injury for vets.

Another common situation for vet and nurse injuries were when animals were recovering from anaesthesia.

Nearly 10% of all injuries in the study were needlestick-related, often linked to handling practices.

The study also uncovered a strong culture of presenteeism, where staff continue to work despite injury, often due to fear of letting colleagues down or their dedication to their patients.

Between 16 and 23% of staff attended hospital for their most recent injury and more than 25% needed more than seven days to recover from their injury. 

Despite this fewer than 14% of respondents took more than seven days off work.

When outlining reasons for the injury occurring, particularly during animal restraint, participants attributed their injury on a colleague’s actions or a miscommunication.

Around half of respondents said they would not change their behaviour if faced with the same situation again, even after being injured.

Thematic analysis revealed a weak safety culture, particularly among veterinary surgeons, who were the least likely to report injuries.

Many viewed injuries as inevitable or not worth reporting.

Dr. Tulloch said: “This research highlights the everyday risks faced by veterinary professionals, particularly those in companion animal practice.

"While many injuries are accepted as part of the job, our findings show that many are preventable with the right training, equipment, and safety culture.

“Our study calls for a shift toward a positive safety culture, built on open reporting, shared responsibility, and reflective learning.

"It highlights the need for targeted interventions in high-risk areas such as animal restraint, anaesthetic recovery, and sharps handling.

“Achieving this safety culture shift requires strong organisational leadership across the profession and a commitment to fostering a work environment where all staff feel they speak openly and take accountability for workplace safety.”

Imogen Schofield, Director of Clinical Research at CVS, said: "As a result of the research, CVS has set up a working group looking at how we can reduce the top causes of accidents and improve the under-reporting figure.

"We are also looking at how we can use information held within our practice management system to understand more fully rates of accident per consult numbers or numbers of needlestick injuries per injections given.”

CVS says the full findings of the research will be shared with the wider veterinary community in due course, to support industry-wide improvements in occupational health and safety.

PS: Whilst you're here, take a moment to see our latest job opportunities for vet nurses.