comparison

Re: comparison

Maisy — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:59:24 GMT

As far as I'm aware KBr was never a licensed drug and its only with the new Genitrix drug becoming available that a license has been granted. Because it is a sedative that's why its normally in the DD cupboard but the therapeutic index is so low, its not likely to affect as much in cases of OD as with others.

Re: comparison

Phrin Vernon RVN — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:38:10 GMT

[quote user="Nick Shackleton"]

[quote user="Phrin SVN"]

[quote user="Nick Shackleton"]

Epilease is in the cat AVM-GSL

[/quote]

I thought it was a dog only prep? This is really bugging me now! LOL!

I remember in the days before epilease etc, the KBr was kept in the DD cupboard, so would be surprised if it is GSL

[/quote]

well that's what it says in the latest ed of forumlary! Yeah I remember the days of the powder being in the DD cupboard!

[/quote]

Well I won't argue with the formulary! But I'm still a bit confused!

How can something have a veterinary dispensing classification and apparently not be liscensed? And how can a drug that used to be kept in the DD cupboard be GSL?

Re: comparison

Nick Shackleton — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:32:01 GMT

[quote user="Phrin SVN"]

[quote user="Nick Shackleton"]

Epilease is in the cat AVM-GSL

[/quote]

I thought it was a dog only prep? This is really bugging me now! LOL!

I remember in the days before epilease etc, the KBr was kept in the DD cupboard, so would be surprised if it is GSL

[/quote]

well that's what it says in the latest ed of forumlary! Yeah I remember the days of the powder being in the DD cupboard!

Re: comparison

Phrin Vernon RVN — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:25:26 GMT

[quote user="Nick Shackleton"]

Epilease is in the cat AVM-GSL

[/quote]

I thought it was a dog only prep? This is really bugging me now! LOL!

I remember in the days before epilease etc, the KBr was kept in the DD cupboard, so would be surprised if it is GSL

Re: comparison

Nick Shackleton — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:17:29 GMT

Epilease is in the cat AVM-GSL

Re: comparison

Phrin Vernon RVN — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:12:13 GMT

I was googling earlier when the thread started, and couldn't find any info so didn't post - it's bugging me too though! Will make a bee line for the dispensary on Monday to see what the legal catergory is, as like another poster noted - It's not on NOAH! I even went on the manufacturers website in search of a data sheet but couldn't find one!

It was classed as a nutricutical at college, but also a POM-V??? If it's a POM-V then surely its licensed???

Re: comparison

Maisy — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:08:47 GMT

I'm sure Epilease is manufactured by VetPlus in which case it would be a neutraceutical

Re: comparison

Sal the 1st — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:02:17 GMT

just done a search and it says prescription drug but not in USA. can see this is going to bug me now!

Re: comparison

xXx Cat xXx — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:55:10 GMT

Its a salt so I guess it might fall into that category.

xXx

Re: comparison

Sal the 1st — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:46:44 GMT

[quote user="xXx Cat xXx"]

Just checked out a few internet drug sites for both of the above and all sites required a prescription to buy.

So can assume they are both POM drugs but don't appear in the NOAH compendium

xXx

[/quote]

thanks for that , you have got me thinking now - if they dont appear in NOAH does that make them a neutraceutical?

Re: comparison

xXx Cat xXx — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:39:18 GMT

Just checked out a few internet drug sites for both of the above and all sites required a prescription to buy.

So can assume they are both POM drugs but don't appear in the NOAH compendium

xXx

Re: comparison

Sal the 1st — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:07:08 GMT

thats what I thought? - and I can remember a couple of clients that used to get a prescription to buy it off the internet?

Re: comparison

Steph Worsley — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:01:53 GMT

really havent got a clue, cos epliease is licensed, both are POM-V's think genetrix are mistaken!!!