WARNING!

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:26:48 GMT

[quote user="Arlo Guthrie"]

[quote user="SaskiaVN"]

Hey Arlo, are the children keeping you awake or do you have some form of technology that alerts to to a bit of panic on the forum!!!! Thanks, by the way.

[/quote]

Wish I did have a bit of technology like that! Nope - just can't sleep, and when I'm awake, I work!

[/quote]

Judging by the time you made that post 05.31, I see what you mean Didnt have a well rested night myself if thats any consolation

Carolyn, I will make an estimated guess that you went to bed

Re: WARNING!

Caro Laithwaite VN — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:37:48 GMT

I did not bother staying l went to bed, l had already decided on what l would do.. take a guess

Re: WARNING!

Arlo Guthrie — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:31:46 GMT

[quote user="SaskiaVN"]

Hey Arlo, are the children keeping you awake or do you have some form of technology that alerts to to a bit of panic on the forum!!!! Thanks, by the way.

[/quote]

Wish I did have a bit of technology like that! Nope - just can't sleep, and when I'm awake, I work!

Re: WARNING!

Louise B — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:25:42 GMT

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:23:28 GMT

You'll make a fortune hehe

Re: WARNING!

Louise B — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:22:21 GMT

LOL - I'll come and do an Ann Summers party for you!

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:21:29 GMT

erm..... thinking of ideas hehe

Re: WARNING!

Louise B — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:19:35 GMT

Are you? So what you doing wasting time on here then

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:53:12 GMT

sex, sex and alcohol - definitely having fun!!!!!

Re: WARNING!

Louise B — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:53:03 GMT

Tee, hee, hee - I am going to enjoy this

Re: WARNING!

Caro Laithwaite VN — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:50:51 GMT

Ok back to other plan. Seems l was right Louise was off the forum when it was sent thats why id did not show it. She just returned the email and assuming it is over 10mins since she clicked options it shows as retun message to me so back to 2 choices:

1) Arlos = keep message titles innocuis

2) Mine = Go overboard and have fun.

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:48:41 GMT

Hey Arlo, are the children keeping you awake or do you have some form of technology that alerts to to a bit of panic on the forum!!!! Thanks, by the way.

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:47:12 GMT

ok, same as me then

Re: WARNING!

Caro Laithwaite VN — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:45:54 GMT

In that bottom section l have none ticked but do not forget it will take at least 10mins to kick in if you are trying test messages. So long as Louise was online when l sent mine and had not logged off and the system was in catch up mode (and don't worry l know almost what l am waffling on about with that comment)

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:45:06 GMT

[quote user="Caro Laithwaite"]

Returns l send show but not what l send as l have them turned off in my options.

Edit Profile
Options (scroll to very bottom)
Activity Message Types to Log
All bar say my status are not ticked l like the privacy have had it like that since the start.

[/quote]

Carolyn, I have 'unticked' all my boxes, if that makes any sense. Not so good on this technology as you. Which should I leave ticked?

Re: WARNING!

Arlo Guthrie — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:39:08 GMT

Hmm - this is just the system within the site which says where everyone is online. It uses the title of the page you're on (which in the case of a message, is the subject line of the message).

As Caro said, other members can't read the content of the message, or know who sent it to who. Let's say you look to see who is online, and you see that I am looking at a page with some dodgy title, which is in fact a conversation. You don't know whether i sent it, or received it, nor do you know what the content of the message was.

If in doubt, best thing is just to make you subject title innocuous.

Re: WARNING!

Caro Laithwaite VN — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:34:24 GMT

OK l have just sent Paula (Saskia) a pvt message sex sex sex and alcohol it shows on her name as arrived but not mine as sent l have all my options off

When she sent it back it showed where l was as she was not off on options

I sent louise a message and she has not showed nor have l as our options are off.

Re: WARNING!

Caro Laithwaite VN — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:27:16 GMT

And if worst comes to worst l forsee some fantastic headings soming up hehehe

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:26:50 GMT

phew......big sigh of relief, thanks C x

Re: WARNING!

Caro Laithwaite VN — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:24:02 GMT

No need to panic the contents are TOTALLY private it is just the heading that shows

Re: WARNING!

Louise B — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:21:58 GMT

LOL - I wish [:'(]

Re: WARNING!

Saskia Quinn — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:21:09 GMT

oops, I may have had what I assumed was a private conversation with Carolyn Nothing that was said or would offend anyone but it was private so if you have seen it......

Re: WARNING!

Louise B — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:20:56 GMT

Okay, I unticked the status msg box but my alleged love life is still being broadcast

Re: WARNING!

Caro Laithwaite VN — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:17:12 GMT

Need to wait at least 10 min. for any changes to kick in that you have made. And did you really shag them both? l wouldnt know them if l fell over them

Re: WARNING!

Louise B — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:14:20 GMT

Okay, rude messages definitely get broadcast to the rest of the forum. And, incase anybody wonders Brad Pitt & Robbie Williams are not lovers of mine!

Hmmmmm.....

I did notice that Arlo has a screening function for swear words 'coz one of my messages was bleeped out