<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How the law doesn&amp;#39;t protect animals from over-treatment</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/f/nonclinical-discussions/32637/how-the-law-doesn-t-protect-animals-from-over-treatment</link><description> Posted my latest film based on the book Veterinary Controversies and Ethical Dilemmas on YouTube, and I&amp;#39;ve created a new gallery for them here on VetNurse too: https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/m/veterinary-controversies-ethical-dilemmas 
 In this film Peter</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: How the law doesn't protect animals from over-treatment</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/thread/179221?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:03:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:6882a133-e805-4489-be12-e7e395c55c49</guid><dc:creator>Arlo Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone made an interesting comment over on VetSurgeon.org ... which is that vet nurses are ideally placed to perform the role of patient advocate ... challenging both vets and owners if patient welfare might be compromised. But I wonder .... would anyone actually want to put themselves in that potentially difficult situation. Any thoughts anyone?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>