<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>portfolio/assessing</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/f/nonclinical-discussions/3164/portfolio-assessing</link><description> When covering certain pc&amp;#39;s for example, 9.2 pc 8. Correctly identify faults in surgical equipment and materials do you have to cover every item listed in the scope, so for this one it would be instruments and powered equipment as surgical equipment and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: portfolio/assessing</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/thread/28351?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:99c94219-c251-4b02-ab03-f51fb1e07a92</guid><dc:creator>Maisy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My L3 student didn&amp;#39;t include every piece of equipment in the scope, could have taken ages otherwise. We found a couple of items (suture material/kit contents) that were appropriate to use as faults and this was cleared with our IV.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>