<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Radiography</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/f/nonclinical-discussions/2736/radiography</link><description> Its really worrying how out of date the whole radiography syllabus is! It really focuses on cassettes and even manual processing, many people have CR and DR. Radiography is an area with fast development and this should be reflected in the syllabus </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Radiography</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/thread/24320?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:06:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:fcfe7f29-4fe8-48e1-bc55-1107a2a412f5</guid><dc:creator>Nick Shackleton </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Think that all forms of diagnostic imaging should be covered in the syllabus, ie know the theory behind them at least. such as CT, MRI and Fluroscopy. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Radiography</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/thread/23705?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:55:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:3585c2cd-7043-44df-9220-3f608c26b8e8</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;these are points that need to be bought up with lantra.&amp;nbsp; they are asking peple to email them with problembs with the standards as they are being re written for 2010.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;you should tell them xx&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Radiography</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/thread/23704?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:37:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:60d8ec45-65e9-46a9-99e6-df005c494096</guid><dc:creator>albatross</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ok, so if your practice has somethign not in the syllabus, how are you assessed for practicals or portfolios ? Do you use your own equipment but have to tell how you would do it the old way (by reading up about it)? Or do you fail that section? Or do need to go somewhere that does it the syllabus way? Or is this the bit that college should teach you?&lt;br /&gt;This sort of follows on from a discussion I had with a trainee one day about the ways of laying out theatre equipment, folding drapes etc, and they didn&amp;#39;t know but just said each practice can and does teach differently and sometimes it&amp;#39;s not the way in the actual syllabus. They didn&amp;#39;t know because they hadn&amp;#39;t got to exams etc how it affected markings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>