<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>New study to assess the environmental risk from ectoparasite treatments</title><link>/b/veterinary-nursing-news/posts/new-study-to-assess-the-environmental-risk-from-ectoparasite-treatments</link><description> CVS is to fund a study at the University of Bristol to assess the environmental risk from ectoparasite treatments in companion animals. 
 Concern has been expressed in the profession about environmental contamination from products used in companion animal</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: New study to assess the environmental risk from ectoparasite treatments</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/b/veterinary-nursing-news/posts/new-study-to-assess-the-environmental-risk-from-ectoparasite-treatments</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 19:33:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:925c044e-054f-4fbc-9454-d4d60e7c005d</guid><dc:creator>Small World Vet</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm. CVS sell their own parasiticide products of course, so this is not without the potential for &amp;#39;bias (even if transparently so) given that it looks like they are in charge of the statistical processing of the data. I hope not, as some objective and unconflicted research in this area would be welcome. In the meanwhile, I have taken a precautionary approach- not sold spot-on products for dogs for 4 years or so (except for the occasional Advocate for lung worm treatment).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/aggbug?PostID=160011&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>