/b/veterinary-nursing-news/posts/148135 The RCVS Disciplinary Committee has dismissed a case against a Southampton veterinary surgeon after finding him not guilty of serious professional misconduct, saying at all times that he acted in the best interests of a dog under his care. At theen-USTelligent Community 10https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/b/veterinary-nursing-news/posts/148135Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:15:59 GMT1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:cdd29670-44ee-4e81-9464-aeabace8780dcaz vn10<p>I agree. we use vets now and we always email a full history to them and give a hard copy to the owner as well</p> <img src="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/aggbug?PostID=148135&AppID=4&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/b/veterinary-nursing-news/posts/148135Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:45:22 GMT1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:cdd29670-44ee-4e81-9464-aeabace8780dSmegSlayer0<p>A lot of this comes down to the ability of owners to communicate about their pets&#39; treatment to another vet and the limited accesss OOH vets have to animals records. I would suggest that the original vet should have furnished the owners with a history in case OOH treatment was needed.</p> <img src="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/aggbug?PostID=148135&AppID=4&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">