<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>AHDA and AMTRA say BVA is wrong about anthelmintics</title><link>/b/veterinary-nursing-news/posts/139516</link><description> The Animal Medicines Distributors Association (AHDA) and the Animal Medicines Training Regulatory Authority (AMTRA) have both come out against the BVA&amp;#39;s call for all anthelmintic
medicines to be reclassified as POM-V , which would prevent them being</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: AHDA and AMTRA say BVA is wrong about anthelmintics</title><link>https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/b/veterinary-nursing-news/posts/139516</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:03:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1a0763ec-3885-442c-853e-6cef656dfec5:4fe79cda-a1e6-474d-be54-40f72218c6df</guid><dc:creator>Sal the 1st</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;#39;SQPs have to undertake compulsory continuing professional development&amp;#39; - but wouldn&amp;#39;t it be fair to say that in the case of the C-SQP in order to comply with CPD their CPD will be in species they may never encounter?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetnurse.co.uk/aggbug?PostID=139516&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>